AI in the boardroom, without exposing sensitive files
Save hours on notes, syntheses and meeting preparation, yes, but never at the price of an acquisition or reorganization project sitting in a public AI.
Managing directors, executive committee members, board members, business owners: the files where AI helps most (reorganization, negotiation, succession, bank credit) are also the most confidential in the company. Typed into a consumer AI without a data processing agreement, they leave your control before the decision is even made.
The point is not to give up AI, your senior staff already use it to prepare their meetings, but to decide the framework the way you decide everything else.
- Confidential projects exposed by unframed AI usage
- Executive hours absorbed by notes, syntheses and meeting preparation
- Decisions prepared on unverified AI syntheses
- Staff already equipped with AI, with no common rule set by management
See for yourself
A prompt structured in 5 blocks: Instruction · Role and audience · Data · Constraints · Format. An unframed AI invents; the frame stops it.
In a workshop, we build these prompts with your executive committee, on your real files: each sheet spells out its safeguards, and nothing identifying leaves for a public AI.
Synthèse de comité de direction
A clean, complete record of decisions, distributed the same day as the meeting.
See it in Chaptal →Préparation de séance du conseil d’administration
Files digested and likely questions anticipated before you walk into the room.
See it in Chaptal →Note de décision binaire Go / No-Go
Both options and their criteria in black and white, to decide with full knowledge.
See it in Chaptal →30 use cases cover your line of work in the Chaptal catalog, out of 750 in the corpus · each one states what it produces, what it expects from you, and what it refuses to do.
« Le Collaborateur, augmenté »
Your senior staff learn to frame AI on their real files, safeguards included.
See the training →AI usage audit
A survey of what already circulates in your teams, and the framework to hold it.
See audit & advisory →Foire aux questions
Can our confidential projects leave the company through AI?
Yes, if your teams use consumer AI tools without a data processing agreement. We work with anonymized data and tools that train no public model on your content.
Should we ban AI until a framework is in place?
No, a ban pushes usage out of your sight. Simple rules, set by management and known to everyone, protect better than a blockade people work around.
What can AI bring to board meeting preparation?
A synthesis of the files, a framing note, the questions directors are likely to ask. A framed prompt states what it produces and what it refuses · the decision stays yours.
Can a succession or acquisition file be entrusted to AI?
Yes, provided nothing that identifies people or parties goes into a public AI. That is exactly what the framing settles, with anonymization before anything is sent.
Are your tools hosted in Switzerland?
We favor sovereign Swiss or European solutions and flag any dependency that is not. No public model is trained on your data.